Revision Policy
Because academic work doesn’t arrive perfect — it arrives unfinished, questioned, and shaped through feedback.
Revisions are rarely about “mistakes.” More often, they’re about clarity. About alignment. About translating what you meant into what your supervisor expects to see on paper.
We’ve worked with enough DBA candidates to know this part well. Feedback arrives late. Comments feel vague. Expectations shift mid-way.
So this page exists — not to limit revisions, but to explain how we handle them realistically.
How we think about revisions
Academic work is not linear. It moves forward, circles back, then moves again. Revisions are part of that movement — not an exception.
Our revision policy is based on fairness, academic logic, and open communication. Not rigid limits. Not fine print.
What qualifies for a free revision
Free revisions apply when the requested changes are connected to the original instructions shared at the time of placing the order.
- Supervisor or marker feedback
- Clarification of arguments or structure
- Improvements in academic tone or flow
- Referencing and formatting corrections
- Strengthening sections already included in scope
In short — if the foundation hasn’t changed, revisions are handled without hesitation.
When a revision becomes something new
Sometimes feedback doesn’t adjust the work — it redirects it.
A revision may fall outside the original scope if there’s a new topic, research question, methodology, case organisation, or a significant increase in word count.
When that happens, we pause. We explain. And we agree on the next step before proceeding.
Revision timelines
Most revisions are completed within 24–72 hours, depending on the depth and technical nature of the changes.
We don’t rush revisions just to close a loop. The goal is improvement, not speed for its own sake.
What we need from you
Clear feedback helps everyone. Wherever possible, we ask that all comments are shared together rather than in fragments.
This keeps revisions focused and avoids unnecessary back-and-forth.
A realistic boundary
Revisions are meant to improve alignment and academic quality — not to endlessly rewrite work until it feels “perfect.”
Academic standards are objective. Personal preferences often aren’t. We work within that line, honestly.
If you’re ever unsure whether feedback qualifies as a revision, just ask. We’ll look at it carefully — and respond like humans, not systems.